Abstract:
The overall objective of this study is to investigate and document adoption levels and
to specifically determine the factors that affect the adoption process of improved
maize varieties and draw implications for research, extension and policy.
The mean age of adopters and non-adopters of improved maize was more or less 42
years and had similar years o f experience in operating and handling their own farm,
Out of the Adopters of improved maize varieties, 35 were illiterate, 23 had primary
school education, 21- participated in a literacy campaign, and 6 and 9 reached junior
and senior high school, respectively. The average household size of adopters was
7.30 persons, consisting of 3.53 children less than 14 years,*2.03 adult males, 1.91
adult females, and 1.16 aged dependents.
jrhe average farm size of adopters of improved maize varieties was significandy larger
(2.03 ha) than non-adopters (1.42 ha) (t =-6.62, p<0.01). Total cultivated area and the
area allocated to maize production in 1998 by adopters was 1.74 and 0.9 hectares
respectively. r ■
Mean livestock herd size of adopters of improved maize technology was 1.94 oxen,
2.24 cows, 1.99 calves, 1.B4 heifers, 1.59 bulls. On the other hand, 31 of adopters of
improved maize own one ox, 37 own two oxen, 6 own 3 and 4 oxen. The t-test
revealed that there is a significant difference (p<0.001) in the number of oxen owned
by farmers who have adopted improved maize varieties and those who have not.
It was found that 93 of both adopters and non-adopters of improved maize obtained
credit from extension, i.e., the Bureau of Agriculture, at all levels. A systematic
association between adoption of improved maize and access to credit, indicating that
farmers with access to credit have a higher probability of adopting improved maize
varieties than diose households with no access to credit = 747.306;p<0.001).
Maximum likelihood estimates of die parameters and the respective influences of
each exogenous variable on the probability of improved maize adoption are
calculated. With highly significant (p<0.001) model chi-square statistic (yj) 788.178
value (with 16 degrees of freedom) and a 748.356 log likelihood ratio, the model
achieved 90 & correct prediction. Figures for correcdy predicted adopters and nonadopters
of high yielding improved varieties were 95.1 and 73.3, respectively. Among
the factors considered in die model, use of chemical fertilizer, attending formal
training, distance, to the nearest market center, access to credit, tropical livestock unit
access to extension information and family size were found to significantly influenc '
adoption of improved maize.
A logit maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters and the influences of each
exogenous variable on the probability of chemical fertilizer adoption were analyzed.
With highly significant (p<0.001) model chi-square statistic (xO 426.638 value (with
16 degrees of freedom) and a 1093.051 log likelihood ratio, die model achieved 83.5
& correct prediction. Figures for correctly predicted adopters and non-adopters of
improved varieties were 92.7 and 52.3, respectively. Among the factors considered in
die model, use of improved maize, farm experience, distance to the nearest market
center, access to credit, level of education, tropical livestock unit, family size, and use
of' community labor were found to significandy affect adoption of chemical fertilizer.