Abstract:
In most parts of Ethiopia, the main source of water for crop
production is rainfall. Currently, however, it has become
erratic, and unevenly distributed. Inadequate soil and water
management also are tremendously interrupting the
effectiveness and sufficiency of rainfall, even in high rainfall
receiving areas. There is also scarcity of water during dry
cropping seasons. As a result, it becomes an obligation to
establish water conservation and irrigation systems to have it in
Ethiopia. To achieve this, farmer participation and coordination
of the efforts of different institutions is highly considered.
According to the United Nations Population Fund and Central
Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA, 2007/, the world and
Ethiopian population surpassed 7 billion and 73 million,
respectively. The continuous increase of the demographic
situation of Ethiopia has made it imperative to increase
agricultural productivity and production to feed the visibly
noted increasing population. When we were few in population
and drought was not as frequent as it is now, rain fed
agriculture could and did feed our population (Mulugeta and
Karl 2002).
In a nutshell, it is crystal clear that rain fed cultivation alone
will no longer support us, even in good cropping years to be
able to attain food self-sufficiency sustainably. Therefore, using our water resources in the form of irrigation is crucial to
an extra rain fed cultivation, ensure sustainable agriculture, and
coop within the periods of inadequate rainfall.
Land application of wastewater, sludge, and extract is a widely
practiced in different countries. For centuries, farmers in China
used human and animal excrements as fertilizers. Wastewater
and sewage sludge, as manure, have also been used by the
northern European and Mediterranean civilizations (Soulie and
Tremea, 1991). In many European and North American cities,
wastewater was disposed of in agricultural fields before the
introduction of wastewater treatment technologies to prevent
pollution of water bodies. In Paris, for instance, the use of
partially treated wastewater was common until the second part
of the 1990s (Asano et ai.. 2007).
Agricultural use of untreated wastewater has been associated
with land application and crop production for centuries
(Keraita et a L 2008). However, over the years, it has become
less popular in developed countries with the improvement of
treatment technologies and increased awareness of the
environmental and health issues associated with the practice;
by contrast, in developing countries, due to a variety of factors
described later, farmers use it extensively, even drawing
advantages to improve their livelihoods. The oldest references
to the use of extract come from some Asian countries, where it
was used to increase fish production through aquaculture
(WHO, 2006). Sludge management has only recently become
an issue, even for developed countries, because the densely
populated areas are producing such large amounts of sludge and extract that natural assimilation into the environment is not
possible, while space for stockpiling is limited (UNHSP,
2008).
Moreover, management is complex and there is a lack of social
support: people prefer to ignore what happens to extract after it
is disposed of into latrines and they are uncomfortable if it is
brought to their attention, be it in developed or developing
countries (Snyman, 2008). This report attempts to give an
overview of the use of wastewater, extract, and fecal sludge in
agriculture; to characterize their use, the benefits derived, and
the costs involved, particularly regarding health consequences;
and to provide perceptions around such uses and perspectives
for the future. It is to be noted that whilst mention will be made
of reclaimed or recycled water, where relevant, the main thrust
will be on non-treated wastewater.